Monday, February 4, 2008

Disappointing photography


I tried to get a photo of this hottie without being too obvious. I thought I had more shots than this, but this is the only one I can find. It isn't a good picture. I need to practice surreptitious photography.
I should also carry my camera more often. I was passing by the pool one afternoon and saw a very sexy stud. Slim, well defined muscles (but not too bulgy) wearing an ultra hot skin-tight swim suit. He was a very pretty picture that I had no way to capture. (photographically, I mean. I could have used a net, I suppose, but he's probably stronger than I am. He wouldn't fit in my suitcase, either.)

7 comments:

Mark in DE said...

Might I recommend having a photographic eye implanted into your eye socket? Such a shame to have missed the hottie in the tiny swimsuit!

Mark :-)

Java said...

Mark: Yes, it is a terrible shame not to have captured him for posterity. Or for his posterior. He had a VERY nice posterior. Yummmm.

Gregory said...

Thank you sweetheart! What a scream that you so thoughtful---thinking of us while you were away.

Mark Olmsted said...

Listen, we gay men have to practice taking pictures of hotties surreptitiously. Women don't! What do you think, he's gonna punch you in the nose? Just say, "Can I take your picture, I think you're hot!" I guarantee you, he will PREEN.

Anonymous said...

He wouldn't fit in my suitcase, either.

Just borrow one from MaryAlice. That's how she captured "M".

;)

Billy said...

I agree with Marc - you don't need to hide honey, just approach and click away... (He says while creating a picture of hot dude with tight swimming costume in his mind...)

Steven said...

Let me know when you have that art of photography mastered. I run into the same problems. :-)